One day, Justin Trudeau was everywhere—hugging pandas, lecturing world leaders, rolling up his sleeves for photo ops and rolling out carbon taxes. The next? Gone.
In January 2025, after nearly a decade as prime minister, Trudeau announced his resignation, citing “internal divisions” and the need for “party renewal.” Translation: the party was cratering, and even the caucus was done clapping on cue.
By March, Mark Carney was sworn in as prime minister, and Trudeau slipped quietly out the back door of political life. No farewell tour, no glossy legacy video narrated by Bono, not even a final “because it’s 2025” mic drop.
But here’s the curious part: he didn’t just leave office. He disappeared. No university appointments, no paid global speeches, no podcast called Sunny Ways. Just radio silence. For a man who spent 10 years mastering the art of being seen, Trudeau has suddenly become the political equivalent of a legacy app—still installed in memory, but no longer updated.
To be fair, maybe he needed a break. Ten years of coercive progressivism will wear anyone out. He managed to alienate Alberta, fracture Confederation and somehow make carbon taxes feel like a moral failing for heating your home in February. The entire second half of his time as prime minister often seemed less like governing and more like penance for previous optics.
He declared war on Alberta’s energy sector, promising to “phase out” oil and gas while subsidizing battery plants that mostly produced press releases. Meanwhile, Western Canada saw jobs dry up, investment flee and provincial governments scramble to survive a regulatory onslaught dressed up as climate justice.
Then there were the scandals: the ethics violations, the WE Charity affair, the Aga Khan vacation, SNC-Lavalin and the blackface photos that seemed to multiply every few years like reverse campaign ads. Through it all, Trudeau stayed oddly untouched. Critics called it Teflon. Supporters called it charm. Realists said it was just slick messaging and a subservient media.
But perhaps the most lasting legacy of Trudeau’s time in office isn’t a policy or a scandal. It’s the national mood. Ten years of division, top-down lecturing and a government that seemed more interested in feelings than fundamentals left many Canadians weary. For all the talk of sunny ways, the cloud cover never really lifted.
The federal government increasingly prioritized identity over competence, embedding DEI frameworks into everything from hiring to infrastructure policy. Gender ideology became a litmus test for inclusion, and dissent—even reasonable debate—was often framed as hate. It wasn’t just governance by virtue signal—it was governance by checkbox.
Even his signature achievements—legalizing cannabis, gender-balanced cabinets and the carbon pricing regime—ended in either fatigue or backlash. The carbon tax, in particular, has outlived him in the most punishing way. While Trudeau exited stage left, Canadians are still left paying for his green ambitions.
As for what’s next? No one really knows. Rumours swirl that he’s working on a memoir—title options include Because It Was There, The Gender Budget Diaries or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Lobbyists. But for the most part, Trudeau has gone dark.
Which raises the question: how does a man who built a political brand on presence so thoroughly erase himself? Is it intentional? A strategic retreat before a staged return? Or has he realized, like many former world leaders before him, that the limelight burns hotter when the legacy dims?
Either way, it’s telling that Canadians aren’t asking for more. There’s no public clamour for his return, no movement to rescue his vision. In fact, there’s just relief.
Justin Trudeau came to office promising hope and change. He left offering neither. He aimed to reshape Canada and, in some ways, he did: he redefined the role of image in politics, elevated identity as governing principle and proved that good hair and bad ideas can still win elections—for a while.
Whatever happened to Justin Trudeau? He disappeared. But the effects of his policies didn’t. And for many Canadians, that’s the part that still stings.
©
The commentaries offered on Â鶹ÊÓƵ.ca are intended to provide thought-provoking material for our readers. The opinions expressed are those of the authors. Contributors' articles or letters do not necessarily reflect the opinion of any Â鶹ÊÓƵ.ca staff.
