Well, once again you are being subjected to a column about the impending retirement of Peter Mansbridge.
And the reason is because I鈥檓 all worked up by Brian Zinchuk鈥檚 recent From The Top of the Pile column about Mansbridge.
Basically, Zinchuk blasted the CBC for creating a situation where the 鈥渂est and the brightest鈥 could never rise to the top CBC anchor job, because they kept Mansbridge on, forever.
By contrast, he said, chiefs of defence staff are there for only three years and then move on, allowing others to rise the ranks.
鈥淚t鈥檚 about bloody time,鈥 Zinchuk wrote about Mansbridge鈥檚 departure. The headline said it all: 鈥渢he glass ceiling, personified, is finally leaving.鈥
He no doubt will have the same reaction when Rob MacDonald finally leaves the anchor chair at CTV Saskatoon. Or when John Gormley leaves his show. 鈥淚t鈥檚 about bloody time!鈥
I have a different take on it all. When you have a news anchor in place in an organization for a long period of time, that speaks to stability. It speaks to viewer loyalty. Viewers like to see familiar faces on the air. It is part of their routine. It also makes for good business for these TV stations.
By contrast, I can point to a multitude of TV stations that have revolving doors of anchors and reporters. One thing is common about most of them 鈥 they are in chaos. Their bad ratings reflect it.
This notion of 鈥渓et鈥檚 rotate the anchor chair every three or four years to give other people a chance鈥 is simply not going to fly with viewers who like to see the familiar faces.
Still, staying on the job as long as Mansbridge has is liable to get people hurling 鈥済lass ceiling鈥 accusations at him.
The reality is many women, and others, have risen to prominence at CBC News, even with Mansbridge there.
Here鈥檚 one example. During the early years of Mansbridge鈥檚 tenure on The National, Mansbridge鈥檚 show was paired with another news show, The Journal, to make up the full 10 p.m. hour.
That show featured Barbara Frum, who was simply one of the most important, most fearless TV journalists this country has ever seen.
The country would tune in just to see Frum interview world leaders and other big shots. She took no prisoners in those interviews. It was riveting stuff.
She didn鈥檛 need the anchor chair of The National. Barbara Frum was 鈥淭he Journal,鈥 and journalism was better off because of it.
And then she died, prompting the CBC to make big changes.听听听听
It was decided in 1992 that Canada was ready for an hour-long prime-time national newscast 鈥 up against the sitcoms and dramas at 9 p.m.
They put on the air the CBC Prime Time News. They put Mansbridge on that show and paired him up with a female co-anchor,听 none other than Pamela Wallin, who had moved over from CTV.
When people look back on Mansbridge鈥檚 anchor tenure at the CBC, everyone forgets about Prime Time News, and for good reason. Prime Time News was supposed to be the new flagship national CBC newscast, but it was a complete flop at 9 p.m. Nobody wanted to watch a newscast at that hour.听
Meanwhile, 鈥淭he National鈥 was consigned to Newsworld on cable, and was actually anchored by Alison Smith.
Nobody remembers that, either.
Anyway, by 1995 Prime Time News was history. It reverted back to its old name (The National), its old time slot (10 p.m.), and its old host, Mansbridge.
Wallin was fired, an unpopular move that drew outrage from her fans, especially here in Saskatchewan.听听
But things worked out for Wallin. She ultimately got a gig far superior to any job at the CBC 鈥攖he Senate.
That beats the anchor chair of the National hands down. But I鈥檓 digressing.
The bottom line is, the notion of Peter Mansbridge sitting there in his anchor chair for three decades, blocking people from rising the ranks, doesn鈥檛 hold water, not with all the turmoil the TV business has seen, including at the CBC itself during Mansbridge鈥檚 own tenure.
Let鈥檚 give credit to Mansbridge here. Maybe the reason he bucked the trend and survived this long at the CBC has something to do with his credibility in delivering the news to millions of Canadians. 听
Incidentally, there was nothing, absolutely nothing, preventing the CBC from pairing a second anchor to share equal billing with Mansbridge on The National after Wallin left.听
In fact, the CBC should probably have done it years ago. It would have set up a viable succession plan for Mansbridge鈥檚 departure, and might have even helped the ratings.
Lately, The National has been getting hammered by both CTV National News (Lisa LaFlamme) and Global National (Dawna Friesen).
So I have to agree with those who say it鈥檚 time for Mansbridge to go. People are tired of him.
The real problem for The National 鈥 and all these national newscasts, really 鈥 is the whole concept of getting your news from some half-hour or hour-long broadcast is antiquated.
We are in a 24-hour world now. You can access all-news channels on cable and live streams on your computer or iPad. Whether it鈥檚 terrorist attacks, political conventions or rallies, a hurricane hitting somewhere or any other big news, your Twitter or Facebook feed will let you know about it immediately.
By the time 10 p.m. rolls around, you already know what the news is. You don鈥檛 need to watch it again.
That is why Mansbridge鈥檚 departure really marks a turning point for the TV news business. It鈥檚 truly the end of the anchor era.
It鈥檚 also why aspiring TV news people might be better off sending their applications in to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for a senate appointment, instead.
It鈥檚 a far better gig, anyway. Right, Pamela?听听
听
听听听
听
听听听听听