It鈥檚 always rather amusing how political partisans find any excuse possible to justify the lousy performance of their preferred ministers.
Consider the former NDP government in the old Spudco days that managed to find every excuse in the world to justify the $36-million-plus loss and how it was handled.
Leading up to the debacle, the former NDP government had been forthright in insisting that this was a private-public enterprise.
Well, the truth of the matter is, the NDP government was never the least bit honest about this.
It was only through a civil case and the ensuing court documents that we finally saw that then Economic Development Minister Eldon Lautermich had been telling individuals 鈥� including those bidding on the building of the potato storage sheds 鈥� something quite different.
That inspired then premier Lorne Calvert to conduct an internal investigation that concluded Lautermilch and the government had not been forthright.
Even after all that, Lautermilch was still not dropped from cabinet.
Sure, he was relieved from his economic development duties, but he stayed in Calvert鈥檚 cabinet (at full cabinet minister鈥檚 salary) in a lesser capacity.
That鈥檚 not exactly how it works in the real world.
You fail to do your job, you cost your company money and 鈥� at the very least 鈥� you get demoted.
Heck, there鈥檚 even a high likelihood you get fired or you are asked to resign.
That standard also applies in government.
Certainly, that was the standard applied to former NDP SaskPower president Jack Messer after the Channel Lake inquiry and to former SaskPower president Robert Watson after the Smart Meters fiasco.
But ministers do not seem to bear the consequences for their actions.
Like Lautermilch, they remain in cabinet. Essentially, they are rewarded even when they don鈥檛 to their jobs.
Again, it doesn鈥檛 work that way in the real world.
If you forget to put seed in the drill, you don鈥檛 get a whole bunch of supporters apologizing or justifying the job you did.
More likely, you have your neighbours drive past your farm and snicker a bit. And that鈥檚 probably not as bad as the added costs and loss of income you must bear.
Whether you like Economy Minister Bill Boyd or not, it鈥檚 tough to apologize for the job he鈥檚 done in in the wake of Provincial Auditor Judy Ferguson鈥檚 report on the Global Transportation Hub.
In her report to determine whether the purchase of land for Regina鈥檚 inland port reflected 鈥渇air value鈥�, Ferguson determined taxpayers wound up 鈥渂uying land at significantly higher price鈥� because government did not act 鈥渋n a financially responsible manner鈥� when it wound up paying $103,000 an acre for 204 acres. (Other landowners 鈥� under the threat of expropriation 鈥� settled for less than $30,000 an acre. Some are now suing as a result.)
Notwithstanding claims by Premier Brad Wall that Boyd and his government had to pay that much because land was skyrocketing prices, Ferguson said other appraisals actually weren鈥檛 even used in determining the price paid.
The real problem was that Boyd and the government did not have 鈥渃lear land acquisition strategies鈥� and certainly did have 鈥減roper documentation鈥� for their actions.
The Auditor determined that there was a 鈥渦nique board governance and the active involvement of the GTH chair/minister鈥� that simply made decision-making difficult.
Really, what she is saying is that Boyd made all the decisions without any proper oversight from the politically appointed GTH CEO, its board or anyone.
As a result it is Bill Boyd who must be held to account.
And notwithstanding his years in politics and politics and other contributions, his handling of the GTH was a mess that follows costly Smart Meters and carbon capture.
In the real world, there are consequences for a record like this.
Murray Mandryk has been covering provincial politics for over 22 years.
